I think that the origins of Charter 77
illustrate very well what I have already suggested above: that in the post-totalitarian
system, the real background to the movements that gradually assume political
significance does not usually consist of overtly political events or
confrontations between different forces or concepts that are openly political.
These movements for the most part originate elsewhere, in the far broader area
of the ‘pre-political,’ where ‘living within a lie’ confronts ‘living within
the truth,’ that is, where the demands of the post-totalitarian system conflict
with the real aims of life. These real aims can naturally assume a great many
forms. Sometimes they appear as the basic material or social interests of a
group or an individual; at other times, they may appear as certain intellectual
and spiritual interests; at still other times, they may be the most fundamental
of existential demands, such as the simple longing of people to live their own
lives in dignity. Such a conflict acquires a political character, then, not
because of the elementary political nature of the aims demanding to be heard
but simply because, given the complex system of manipulation on which the
post-totalitarian system is founded and on which it is also dependent, every
free human act or expression, every attempt to live within the truth, must
necessarily appear as a threat to the system and, thus, as something which is
political par excellence. Any eventual political articulation of the movements
that grow out of this ‘pre-political’ hinterland is secondary. It develops and
matures as a result of a subsequent confrontation with the system, and not
because it started off as a political programme, project or impulse.
Havel, Vaclav (1986) The Power of the
Powerless. In “Living with Truth.”
London and Boston: Faber and faber. p.65-66.
沒有留言:
張貼留言